Need help with this week’s assignment? Get detailed and trusted solutions for Social Networks Week 3 NPTEL Assignment Answers. Our expert-curated answers help you solve your assignments faster while deepening your conceptual clarity.
✅ Subject: Social Networks
📅 Week: 3
🎯 Session: NPTEL 2025 July-October
🔗 Course Link: Click Here
🔍 Reliability: Verified and expert-reviewed answers
📌 Trusted By: 5000+ Students
For complete and in-depth solutions to all weekly assignments, check out 👉 NPTEL Social Networks Week 3 NPTEL Assignment Answers
🚀 Stay ahead in your NPTEL journey with fresh, updated solutions every week!
NPTEL Social Networks Week 3 Assignment Answers 2025
1. According to Granovetter’s weak tie theory, which situation in this network is most likely to bring new information (like a job opportunity) to Alice?
- Alice’s close colleague in the same team shares a tip
- Alice learns of a job opening from a college acquaintance in another department
- Alice reads about the job in an internal memo posted by HR
- Alice’s mentor (her team leader) informs her directly
Answer : See Answers
2. In the company network, an edge between two employees has high embeddedness. What does this imply about their relationship?
- They have many mutual friends, so they trust each other and can enforce norms
- They are the only connection between their teams, acting as a bridge
- They share no common contacts (neighborhood overlap 0)
- They have completely different roles and no trust
Answer :
3. Alice acts as a liaison between the marketing and engineering teams, which are otherwise not directly connected. What network concept describes Alice’s advantage in this position?
- Clique formation
- Community detection
- Structural hole (brokerage)
- Triadic closure
Answer :
4. In this organizational network, an edge that is the only path connecting two distinct groups of employees (with no alternate route) is called a:
- Strong tie
- Local bridge
- Cluster edge
- Embedded tie
Answer :
5. In this context, which of the following statements about weak ties (Alice’s acquaintances) are correct?
- They tend to be bridges between groups and are crucial for information flow.
- They usually form redundant paths within a tightly knit team.
- They provide access to novel information from outside Alice’s team.
- They create high clustering (closed triads) in Alice’s local network.
Answer :
6. A friendship triad where each person is friends with the other two is called a:
- Closed triad (triangle)
- Structural hole
- Local bridge
- Open triad
Answer :
7. The local clustering coefficient of a student’s node measures:
- How likely the student is to start a rumor
- The proportion of the student’s friends who are also mutual friends with each other
- The number of weak ties the student has
- The number of communities the student belongs to
Answer : See Answers
8. If a student Dave has 4 friends, and among those friends there are 2 friendships (connections) between them, what is Dave’s local clustering coefficient? (Recall it is 2(# of realized friend-friend links)/(k(k-1)) for k friends.)
- 1/6
- 1/3
- 1/2
- 1
Answer :
9. The neighbourhood overlap of an edge between two students X and Y is defined as the fraction of their friends that they have in common. If X and Y share no mutual friends, their neighborhood overlap is 0, and that edge is a:
- Local bridge
- Closed triad
- Strong tie
- Embedded tie
Answer :
10. If Student Y shares 2 mutual friends with Student Z, and Y has total degree 5 (including Z) and Z has total degree 4 (including Y), the neighbourhood overlap is. Which choice best describes this overlap?
- 1/2
- 1/6
- 1/4
- 2/5
Answer :
11. An employee who connects many colleagues across different departments is likely to have increased:
- Social capital by bridging structural holes
- Network constraint and isolation
- Clustering coefficient in their local network
- Closed-loop redundancy
Answer :
12. In the Girvan–Newman community detection method, what is removed first to reveal communities?
- Nodes with highest degree
- Edges with highest betweenness centrality
- Random edges until clusters form
- Edges within dense subgroups
Answer :
13. The Girvan–Newman algorithm produces a hierarchy of communities in the form of a:
- Single cluster
- Dendrogram
- Flat partition
- Matrix of distances
Answer : See Answers
14. If Alice is a broker between two communities, what risk does she face according to social network theory?
- Increased time/energy to maintain ties (trade-off)
- Automatic promotion to a managerial position
- Losing all her intra-community ties
- Having a zero clustering coefficient
Answer :
15. Using the Girvan–Newman algorithm on a network with 20 employees, which approach does it use to determine community splits?
- Checking all possible divisions (brute force)
- Removing the lowest-weight edges first
- Iteratively removing edges with highest between-group communication
- Merging individuals into growing clusters until modularity peaks
Answer :
16. In the mobile phone network, if two users share a large number of common contacts (high neighbourhood overlap), what does Granovetter’s hypothesis predict about their call frequency?
- They will have a very low call frequency.
- They will likely have a high call frequency.
- Neighborhood overlap has no relation to call frequency.
- They will only communicate through intermediaries.
Answer :
17. Empirical findings from the mobile data suggest that edges with high weight (many calls) tend to have:
- High overlap (many mutual contacts)
- Zero overlap (no mutual contacts)
- Always be local bridges
- Be randomly distributed regardless of overlap
Answer :
18. In the call network, what kind of tie (based on overlap) is expected to connect two loosely connected clusters of individuals?
- A strong tie with high overlap
- A weak tie with near-zero overlap
- A repeated strong triadic tie
- A triadic closure edge
Answer :
19. Researchers found that confirming Granovetter’s theory in mobile data indicates which of the following about weak ties in this network?
- Weak ties were associated with high embeddedness.
- Weak ties tended to span between different clusters.
- Strong ties were never present.
- Weak ties had no role in information diffusion.
Answer :
20. If two city residents have an overlap ratio Oij=0.5Oij=0.5 in their call network, which statement is true?
- They share all their contacts in common.
- They have half of their respective contacts in common (suggesting a fairly strong tie).
- They share no contacts in common.
- They do not communicate by phone.
Answer :
21. A brute-force community detection method:
- Iteratively removes edges by centrality.
- Tries every possible division of nodes into groups.
- Merges nodes based on degree.
- Uses edge overlap metrics only.
Answer : See Answers
22. The main drawback of brute-force methods compared to Girvan–Newman is:
- They cannot find the optimal solution.
- They run too quickly for large networks.
- They are computationally expensive (exponential time).
- They ignore edge weights.
Answer :
23. Girvan–Newman diff ers from brute-force in that it:
- Seeks communities by maximizing the local clustering coefficient.
- Recursively removes likely inter-community edges.
- Randomly assigns nodes to communities.
- Requires prior knowledge of the number of communities.
Answer :
24. In a small test network, both brute-force and Girvan–Newman find two communities of equal size. What advantage might Girvan–Newman have?
- It guaranteed the globally best partition.
- It is easier to explain by edge betweenness concept.
- It provides a clear hierarchy (dendrogram).
- It avoids calculating any centrality measures.
Answer :
25. Which statement is true about these two community detection approaches?
- Brute-force always yields fewer communities than Girvan–Newman.
- Girvan–Newman cannot handle weighted networks.
- Brute-force exhaustively finds the best split by any criterion (e.g., intra/inter edge ratio).
- Girvan–Newman is also brute-force in computing betweenness.
Answer :
26. A local bridge in this network is an edge whose endpoints have:
- High neighborhood overlap (many mutual friends).
- No mutual friends (neighborhood overlap 0).
- Maximum betweenness centrality.
- Been reinforced by multiple interactions.
Answer :
27. In terms of rumor propagation, edges with high embeddedness (many mutual neighbors) tend to:
- Quickly spread rumors to new parts of the network.
- Keep the rumor circulating within a local clique.
- Stop the rumor entirely.
- Always become local bridges.
Answer :
28. Which statement about rumors and weak ties is supported by network theory?
- Rumors spread faster along edges with many mutual friends.
- Bridges (weak ties) help the rumor jump between cliques.
- Only strong ties carry rumors in a dense network.
- Rumors cannot cross a local bridge.
Answer :
29. If student X has a friendship that is a local bridge to another cluster, X is likely:
- Highly embedded in their own clique and also well-connected to the other clique.
- Having no influence on rumor spread.
- The sole connection point for the rumor to reach the other cluster.
- Part of a complete triad with the other cluster.
Answer :
30. When a rumour starts in a dense clique, which tie is most critical for spreading it outside the clique?
- Any strong tie within the clique.
- Weak tie that is a local bridge to another clique.
- The tie with the highest clustering coefficient.
- A randomly chosen tie.
Answer : See Answers


